What are the key differences between the SegWit 2x fork and other forks in the cryptocurrency industry?

3 answers

• Dec 17, 2021 · 3 years ago
  The SegWit 2x fork, also known as the New York Agreement, was proposed as a solution to the scalability issues faced by Bitcoin. It aimed to increase the block size limit to 2MB, while implementing the Segregated Witness (SegWit) protocol. This approach was different from other forks, which typically focused on either increasing the block size or implementing new features. The SegWit 2x fork had significant support from industry players, but ultimately faced controversy and was called off due to lack of consensus.
  519260
• Dec 17, 2021 · 3 years ago
  When it comes to implementation, the SegWit 2x fork required a hard fork, meaning that it would have resulted in a split in the blockchain. Other forks, such as Bitcoin Cash or Bitcoin Gold, also required hard forks. However, there are forks like Litecoin or Ethereum that have implemented changes through soft forks, which do not result in a split. This difference in implementation has implications for the compatibility and adoption of the forked coins.
  456152
• Dec 17, 2021 · 3 years ago
  As for the impact on the blockchain, the SegWit 2x fork would have created a new chain with a larger block size, potentially increasing transaction capacity. However, it could have also led to a fragmentation of the Bitcoin community and ecosystem. Other forks have had varying impacts, with some gaining significant market value and community support, while others have struggled to gain traction. It's important to note that each fork has its own unique set of circumstances and goals, which ultimately determine their success or failure.
  540135